Movie posters can suck for any number of reasons. The most common and hilarious offenders involve bad Photoshopping, but that's just the tip of the iceberg. As you go down this list, you'll see that there's more than one way to horribly market a film. But hey, maybe that was their brilliant scheme all along. After all, it got us talking about it.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, bangkok dangerous]()
Since it was such an easy target, we'll start here. Among all the glaring WTF aspects of this poster, the immediate thing you ask yourself is, "Did they forget to add a gun in his hand?"
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, blonde and blonder]()
Heads clearly Photoshopped onto separate bodies aside, literally everything else about this trainwreck of a poster. And one of them hardly even looks blonde!
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, everybody's fine]()
Robert De Niro is taking this selfie, yes? We didn't realize he was so flexible. But then again, they did virtually airbrush his entire face off, so it's hard to tell how old he is.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, good luck chuck]()
Seriously? They shot an entire freakin' movie together! Couldn't they get them both in the same room to snap a couple pictures?
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, hit by lightning]()
At least these three actors were totally in the same room when this poster was shot. You can tell by two of them having their clothes on. They could have at least matched the names to the proper actors.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, takers]()
Pick a body, any body. Now, put a random actor's head on top of it. No, don't even worry about sizing it to fit. It will look just fine.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, brick]()
With such a descriptive title, I guess we don't need much in terms of what the hell the movie is about on the poster. Cool random quote, though.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, our brand is crisis]()
The incredibly stupid title isn't the only reason this movie tanked. What is it even about? Is Sandra Bullock telekinetic? Is she blind? What is FNB? What is any of this?
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, forced vengeance]()
The only thing this poster does right is put Chuck Norris' name really big at the top. Otherwise, who would know that this horrible painting is supposed to look like him?
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, hercules]()
At least that last one didn't look like Greek mythology "Magic Mike." Or a gay porno. Either way, he should see a doctor about those deformed abs.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, one missed call]()
This movie is about killer cell phone voicemails. Why does she have mouths for eyes?
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, the poughkeepsie tapes]()
For those who like their boring posters to be grammatically incorrect, look no further.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, corky romano]()
If you can't remember a time when Chris Kattan was so famous that his face alone could sell a movie, then we're right there with you.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, star trek iv the voyage home]()
"The Voyage Home" or "The Voyage to a Village People Music Video?"
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, superbabies baby geniuses 2]()
If you weren't excited about a sequel to "Baby Geniuses" already, then hopefully this poster of toddlers standing cross-armed wearing sunglasses while likely pooping themselves should do the trick.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, the aristocrats]()
A mishmash of comedians' names and critic reviews can't be wrong.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, avengers age of ultron, the avengers]()
Whatever, everyone is going to go see this movie anyways. Just throw in random promotional photos of each character out of context and have them looking in all different directions. That should cover the bases.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, x-men first class]()
Then again, there is such a thing as too simple.
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, the switch]()
And finally, we couldn't decide which Jason Bateman movie poster was worse, so we'll let you choose. Do you prefer the one where it appears that he's seriously contemplating drinking semen, or...
![worst movie posters, bad movie posters, bad words]()
...basically saying "f--k you, this is the hardest we're going to try to get you to come see our movie." And no one did.

Since it was such an easy target, we'll start here. Among all the glaring WTF aspects of this poster, the immediate thing you ask yourself is, "Did they forget to add a gun in his hand?"

Heads clearly Photoshopped onto separate bodies aside, literally everything else about this trainwreck of a poster. And one of them hardly even looks blonde!

Robert De Niro is taking this selfie, yes? We didn't realize he was so flexible. But then again, they did virtually airbrush his entire face off, so it's hard to tell how old he is.

Seriously? They shot an entire freakin' movie together! Couldn't they get them both in the same room to snap a couple pictures?

At least these three actors were totally in the same room when this poster was shot. You can tell by two of them having their clothes on. They could have at least matched the names to the proper actors.

Pick a body, any body. Now, put a random actor's head on top of it. No, don't even worry about sizing it to fit. It will look just fine.

With such a descriptive title, I guess we don't need much in terms of what the hell the movie is about on the poster. Cool random quote, though.

The incredibly stupid title isn't the only reason this movie tanked. What is it even about? Is Sandra Bullock telekinetic? Is she blind? What is FNB? What is any of this?

The only thing this poster does right is put Chuck Norris' name really big at the top. Otherwise, who would know that this horrible painting is supposed to look like him?

At least that last one didn't look like Greek mythology "Magic Mike." Or a gay porno. Either way, he should see a doctor about those deformed abs.

This movie is about killer cell phone voicemails. Why does she have mouths for eyes?

For those who like their boring posters to be grammatically incorrect, look no further.

If you can't remember a time when Chris Kattan was so famous that his face alone could sell a movie, then we're right there with you.

"The Voyage Home" or "The Voyage to a Village People Music Video?"

If you weren't excited about a sequel to "Baby Geniuses" already, then hopefully this poster of toddlers standing cross-armed wearing sunglasses while likely pooping themselves should do the trick.

A mishmash of comedians' names and critic reviews can't be wrong.

Whatever, everyone is going to go see this movie anyways. Just throw in random promotional photos of each character out of context and have them looking in all different directions. That should cover the bases.

Then again, there is such a thing as too simple.

And finally, we couldn't decide which Jason Bateman movie poster was worse, so we'll let you choose. Do you prefer the one where it appears that he's seriously contemplating drinking semen, or...

...basically saying "f--k you, this is the hardest we're going to try to get you to come see our movie." And no one did.